Regions Vintage Report:

‘The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated’ wrote the genial and entertaining Mark Twain. And I couldn’t but help think of this quote by day 3 of the annual trip to taste Bordeaux en-primeur. This time round it is the 2012 vintage and a pretty damned good one it is. Yet if the murmurings of some of my trade colleagues were to be believed during the last 6 months the world was about to end. Bordeaux was finished, expired, no interest, crap vintage – and the jungle drums transmit their mantra pretty quickly whether it is a message of hope (more accurately, hype, these days) or doom. As recently as mid-March at the annual London tasting of the Cercle de Rive Droite association – a collection of Right Bank chateaux – I listened to people decrying the wines and the vintage before and during the tasting. It was an entirely unmerited viewpoint I hasten to add. There were lots of lovely wines on display from St Emilion, Pomerol and their satellites. Are people attending these events actually tasting or merely gassing and recycling received ideas? Mini-rant over – the 2012 Right Bank, at the very least, looked promising on this showing.The annual Easter-time trip to the region itself for the Union de Grand Crus tastings confirmed this and more. From the first visit of the week at Haut Bailly to the last at Pontet Canet, it proved to be a vintage of more pleasant than unpleasant surprises. It is a vintage that produced superb wines in Pomerol, lovely St Emilions that people might actually want to drink and very good red Pessac Leognans, with even better dry whites from this appellation. The Left Bank was more sporadic with some disappointments here and there but just as many successes to make up. People who want good Pauillac, St Julien and Margaux will find them, although a bit more guidance and care may be required. I don’t like to stick the knife in but Sauternes was weak with few top Chateaux daring to show their wines at this stage it appeared. Climens reportedly made a very good set of component parts, but many others produced light, early-drinking almost aperitif-styled wines rather than the luscious glories we have come to expect. Ah well, most people have too many sweeties in the cellar already and few opportunities to open them don’t they? So 2012 might prove a good year to pass on Sauternes and find an excuse to look out the corkscrew for earlier vintages. So, overall, not exactly a tragedy.Growing seasonBordeaux is a big region that produces as much as wine as Australia so even a fairly disastrous vintage should have some wines of merit, but 2012 is nothing like that. Challenging yes, but manageable, especially in these modern times with capital, technology and selection at unprecedented levels. And true to the very history of the region where different grapes are planted in different terroirs for sound viticultural reasons and ‘hedging’ purposes, 2012 comes into its own. While in 2009 and 2010 Cabernet may have been king, in 2012 it was the earlier ripening Merlot that flourished before October rains came in hard and viciously to spoil any ‘Next Vintage of the Century’ parties that may, or may not, have been planned.Earlier the season began following a cold dry winter and was characterised by a damp and cool spring that made flowering a long, uneven and arduous process. Coulure was a feature and cool weather persisted into the early part of summer bringing threats of oidium and mildew to the vines. Vigilance in the vineyard was key both among the traditional vignerons and the new ‘fancy Dans’ with their ‘Bio’(dynamic) practices. There was much spraying and Pontet Canet were among them, albeit with their ‘plant-based infusions’ (it worked as they produced a rich, clean wine from strong-skinned late-picked grapes.) The better chateaux practised green harvesting to concentrate the crop and eliminate unripe bunches. Resultant yields were significantly down, but crop thinning along with leaf thinning meant well ventilated and healthy small berried bunches were possible come harvest time.Eventually the sun had to come out and during August and September temperatures soared, conditions resembling 2000 and 2009 with favourable cooler nights to boot. Good fruit and tannin development with aromatic freshness remained possible although hydric stress was an issue for many depending on their individual terroirs and it showed markedly in some wines from the Northern Medoc and Margaux too. Merlot from both banks tended to be harvested in ideal conditions in late September early October and many a winemaker was relieved and self-congratulatory in completing the harvest just hours before the rains arrived. Cabernet was trickier and frequently picked in warm but wet conditions in early to mid October: the greater variation on the Left Bank is to be seen in how estates handled their Cabernet.The WinesIt is hard to generalise totally and it is best to split the analysis up into the bigger appellations although people will, with some justification, call it a Merlot year. As mentioned the Merlot based wines of Pomerol were superb: lush, succulent, pin-point small-berried fruit with a good transparent mineral component and many showing near perfectly balanced structure in terms of acidity, tannins and alcohol. No shortage of contenders for the cellar from Pomerol in 2012. St Emilion fared very well too. I personally much prefer the style of 2012 in St Emilion to the huge vintages 2009/2010 where I find many of the wines impenetrable and too gargantuan in weight and alcohol for their own good. 2012 suits the wines much better in my view – give me a Troplong Mondot 2012 to either of the recent ‘big’ years any day. Many of the top names exhibited similar restraint and there is real delineation and definition to admire in the wines with no shortage of plump, generous dark fruit. Some fine wines were made at some of the lesser names too; it will be interesting to see if pricing and allocations allows for a ‘supermarket sweep’ of these right bank appellations. The various satellite appellations of St Emilion and Lalande de Pomerol should produce rich pickings too at modest pricing levels. The dry whites of the Graves were wonderful by and large: pronounced citrus fruits, grapefruit, lemon, orange and key lime, as well as greengage to the fore with a subtle classic waxy element depending on the proportion of Semillon in the blend. They won’t make anyone rich but they are hard to knock in 2012. The big-name normal suspects can be rounded up and other oft overlooked chateaux like Latour Martillac, even the unclassified Chateau Brown show the strength of the vintage here. The reds were not quite so homogenous but nonetheless some very high quality wines produced and it was difficult to find much at fault with names as Haut Bailly and Pape Clement even if they are produced in such different styles.The Left Bank is where it gets complicated. I tasted good and bad from St Estephe, Pauillac, St Julien and Margaux and the Haut Medoc. From Margaux for instance there were styles that ranged from soft, light and easy-going almost 2007-like at Angludet to the heavier almost brittle Lascombes. Somewhere in the middle there were some good wines, such as Boyd and Brane Cantenac, Rauzan Segla as well as a fairly spectacular set at Chateau Palmer. This jumbled picture was repeated in the other appellations. I tasted some very good wines such as the Barton duo and Poyferre, who were really on form in St Julien but this was counterbalanced by lightweight efforts from the likes of Beychevelle. Pauillac had several winners – a decent Duhart, a pair of good Pichons and a late picked Pontet Canet for instance, although there were some disappointments too – I was not too sure about Carruades de Lafite nor, whisper it, the Grand Vin itself, if I’m totally honest. I tried less from St Estephe and the northern Medoc but what I did try looked weaker, save a terrific effort at Cos D’Estournel from new CEO Aymeric de Gironde, a really classy and unforced wine that surprised and transcended the vintage in this district. And it is not all about big names making good wines in 2012. The Haut Medoc threw up some very good wines at all levels Citran – yes Citran – Camensac, Cantemerle; all the C’s but who all scored B+ marks and above in their less glamorous appellation.Comparisons? And…to buy?The obvious comparison in terms of red wines or their success is 1998 – at least in the success of specific appellations – Pomerol, St Emilion and Pessac Leognan have all done well. Style-wise time will tell whether this vintage comparison is valid but qualitatively it is a reasonable first port of call. In terms of how the wines compare with recent vintages in the quality hierarchy the complication is the Left/Right Bank split. The good wines from the Left Bank whilst no 2009/10 are certainly a match for the 2008’s, with the high points possibly a little higher. The Right Bank wines are much better and in the very good vintage range e.g. 1998/2000/2001. Are we buying? The proof will be in the pricing. This year’s en-primeur campaign is probably on a knife edge. Too much optimism and hype seems to generate far too high prices, whereas too much pessimism seems to generate virtually no interest. The proprietors claim to be listening to the market and the clamour for lower pricing from merchants on behalf of the end user. As 2012 vintage is not a ‘vintage of the century’, but a good one nonetheless, there is actually a chance for an interesting pricing scheme that benefits all the players which is as it should be. The ball is in the proprietor’s court – will they want to play? We live in hope…Kenny Stewart, Head of Fine WinesApril 2013©adVINture 2020